Text COM:1983039 (268 lines)
From: Hare
Krsna dasi (Brunswick, Maine - USA)
Date:
01-Jan-99 16:58
Cc: (Bhakta)
Fernando Dias (Belem - Brazil) [1655]
(received: 04-Jan-99
12:32)
Cc:
Apocalypse 1999? (Are you ready?) [340]
Cc: Cow
(Protection and related issues) [2925]
Cc: (ISKCON)
Social and Economic Development [2406]
Cc: UK
National Council [1523]
Cc:
Varnasrama development [8470]
Reference: Text COM:1978034 by Tribhangananda (das) ACBSP
(GB)
Comment: Text
COM:1985651 by Kaunteya (das) JPS (Mayapur - IN)
Comment: Text
COM:1987239 by (Bhakta) Oleg Demtchenko (Nikolaev - RU)
Comment: Text
COM:1987995 by Tribhangananda (das) ACBSP (GB)
Remark:
Protected receiver: UK Forum
Subject: "We
shall give them employment on our farms"
------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 31 Dec 1998, COM: Tribhangananda (das) ACBSP (GB)
wrote:
> [Text 1978034 from COM]
>
> > > > A third alternative would be to
simply
> > > > pack it all in and migrate en-masse
to Mayapur. I'm sure they'd just
love
> > > > to have hundreds of us all tramping
in.
> > >
> >
> > I have some questions on this regard: don't you
think that this influx will
> > spoil the preparation of such places? Will they
have food & shelter for
> > twice, 3x or more people? Specially when you
consider the need of a
one-year
> > supply.
>
> I don't know if it will be six months or a year or
indefinitely. Personally,
> I'm assuming that the general will to survive may
help to ensure some
practical
> survival strategies for society (including ISKCON)
to be evolving by then.
For
> example, growing food, although this will also
depend on how well we prepare
> with non-hybrid seeds, agricultural/gardening skills
and equipment, etc. But
to
> become a part of those strategies, if we're not so
on the ball, may take US
> more time than for many.
>
> (NB non-hybrids are ones that produce good quality
seeds for future
generations
> of crops from their plants, but modern society
massively depends upon
hybrids.
> The "child" seeds from these are largely
innefective or unreliable for the
next
> crop, so we can expect large scale famines in 2001
onwards, without some
major
> re-organisatinal changes, if these are actually
still possible.)
>
> It would be prudent, would it not, to prepare for
such an influx? After all,
> many devotees (and others) will recognise the fact
that survival on their own
> will be very difficult, may not have the resources
at their disposal and may
> find the idea of being cut off from association for
an indefinite period
rather
> depressing. Are they to be turned away at the door?
After all, Prabhupada did
> give us the responsibility for making sure that
no-one goes hungry within so
> many miles of our centres.
>
> > If we flock all devotees in a country to one or
two communities, how are we
> > going to spread afterwards?
>
> That we will have to see, but certainly we've seen
how not everyone can stay
in
> a huddled community indefinitely, and I'm sure the
motivation will come
sooner
> or later to branch out and move out, as it has
historically in our movement.
>
> > Will communities be livable with hundreds or
thousands of people? Won't
they
> > have the very same problems of big cities, like
infrastructure?
>
> Everything changes in this world, whether we get
used to it or not.
> Adaptability is a key survival strategy both
collectively and individually.
We
> do, however, have to remain focused on our goal,
which is somehow or other
> preaching. That requires the survival of devotees,
and there are many now who
> currently have moved out from the temples. Its quite
likely that communities
of
> devotees will both form and swell. But being
prepared in advance of a crisis
is
> a distinct advantage.
>
> your servant,
Tribhangananda das
>
********************************
Hare Krsna dasi responds:
Many very good points are being addressed here. I believe that Srila
Prabhupada wanted us to be able to use our
self-sufficiency as a way of
attracting others to Krsna consciousness. Y2K and the years after will
provide increasing opportunities for us to do that -- if
we cooperate to
prepare ourselves.
This means city and rural temples must cooperate.
Rural communities should inform their city temples that
their policy for
Y2K will be "Little Red Hen"
participation. In other words: City temples
cannot count on being welcome to stay in our rural
communities unless they
begin *now* to help build up those communities.
Cities have the money; rural communities have the land
and the brawn.
Neither can really prosper without the other. Cities temples need to be
willing to invest money to build additional housing and sewage
facilities,
also additional farm equipment, etc.
Monthly meetings and joint projects between city temples
and nearby rural
communities will help put things in place for a smooth
transition for
January 2000 (One year from today).
City temples need to take stock of what the situation
*might* be in
January 2000. If I
were a husband, there is no way that I would want my
wife and children to stay in a city temple after Dec 20,
1999 -- until
sometime in January when it is clear that there is sufficient
heat, water,
sewage and electricity to care for them -- and until it
is clear that they
will not be endangered by roving bands of vandals and
looters taking
advantage of deadened burgalar alarms.
If I were a pujari, I would be seriously considering
whether it would be
possible to provide enough water to bathe the Deities and
Their pujaris if
the municiple water system shut down for a couple of
weeks. I might think
our Deities would be warmer, safer and more comfortable
if I moved them to
a rural community for the crisis period.
The water system may shut down, or it may not. But there is a significant
chance that it will.
So the responsible thing is to plan how to keep the
Deities safe in the event that it does. Just like in Los Angeles, during
the earthquake a couple years ago. There was a chance that the temple
would collapse. It
wasn't certain, but there was a significant chance
that the Deities would be hurt, so the pujaris quickly
moved them out of
the temple, until it became clear that the danger had
passed.
But, all of these things need to be thought out,
discussed and planned out
well in advance.
City and rural communities need to build communications
and increase devotee friendships and service
coordination. Otherwise, the
result will be a disaster.
*********************************************
WHAT ABOUT INVITING NON-DEVOTEES INTO OUR RURAL
COMMUNITIES?
It seems that Srila Prabhupada wanted us to be able to do
this. Here are
two excerpts:
"Live in the Lap of Material Nature and Depend on
Krsna" March 1982
interview of Tejiyas das, head of ISKCON Bhubaneswvara by
Paramananda
dasa, ISKCON Minister of Agriculture. ISKCON Farm Newletter v.2, n.1,
1983:
(Tejiyas:) So in terms of the preaching directly, the
farm itself is a
place for devotees to come and be trained. Prabhupada indicated that many
times that it is very essential to have places. When there are large
upsets in the economic and social conditions of the world
he said millions
of people won't even have any other place to get
food. We will have to
show them how to do everything. That will come because the world doesn't
know how much they are depending upon industrial
civilization...
There will be a point when Krsna consciousness expands
very quickly,
quicker than we can think of. This is Lord Caitanya's prophecy. There
will be so many nice situations...When we first got the
hardbound Gitas
and Prabhupada was saying we should distribute them and
the hardbound
Krsna books came from Japan, it was a big inconceivable
thing.
So how are there going to be thousands and thousands of
farms with people
coming in by the millions? Prabhupada said we would be maintaining them.
He said there will not be any food elsewhere to eat. He said they will
not know how to grow grains. They won't know how to do it. They just
have forgotten.
They do not know how to live self-sufficiently...
********************
INDIA, JANUARY 11, 1977
CONVERSATION ON TRAIN TO ALLAHABAD
Hari-sauri: Should we try to make an effort to have our
householders go
and live on the farms, a special effort? If it's ready to
do that?
Prabhupada: Why householders? Everyone. Hare Krsna.
(japa)
Ramesvara: In America there is a very big emphasis on
getting people to
join us by moving into our temples. The temple presidents
are very eager
to get as many people to move in as possible, but in the
long run most
people cannot come up to the standard.
Prabhupada: Therefore I am [advocating] farms.
Ramesvara: So they have to be encouraged to have a little
bit of Krsna
consciousness in their own home, make their home a
temple.
Prabhupada: No, let them go to the farm, New Vrindaban.
Ramesvara: Many people... Most people in the world, they
are grhamedhis,
and they cannot give it up so easily.
Prabhupada: "No, you remain... Come here with your
wife, children. You
remain grhamedhi."
Jagadisa: New Vrindaban is very austere. If we build
little bungalows with
modern convenience...
Prabhupada: Oh, yes.
Jagadisa: There has to be some modern convenience.
Prabhupada: Oh, yes. Then we shall do that.
Ramesvara: But for many people who live in the cities,
they have their
jobs already. They don't want to give it up...
Say, in America, most people live in the cities, and they
already have
their job, and they are set in their ways.
Prabhupada: But you said that there is unemployment also.
Ramesvara: To a certain extent. But there are still
250,000,000 people. So
most of them...
Prabhupada: So those who are unemployed, let them come to
us. We shall
give them employment.
Ramesvara: Yes. But for the mass population...
Prabhupada: Well, gradually you will increase and...
Ramesvara: We have to give them something that they can
do in their home.
Prabhupada: Oh, yes.
Ramesvara: Because it is impractical to think that they
will give up
everything and move into the temple.
Prabhupada: No, those who are unemployed, let them come.
We shall give
them employment.
Jagadisa: On the farm.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Ramesvara: For those who are unemployed, that's
attractive.
Jagadisa: But for those who are already employed...
Ramesvara: But most people have jobs.
Prabhupada: Eh?
Ramesvara: Many people already have their jobs and their
families.
Prabhupada: All right, let them not come, but those who
are unemployed,
let them come.
Ramesvara: But what...? For those people who already have
their jobs,
instead of...
Prabhupada: That job... They will be very soon jobless.
Don't worry.
(laughs) They will come. They will be obliged to come.
Now they have got
job, but as the days are advancing in Kali-yuga, they'll
be jobless.
*******************************
HKDD:
Personally, I believe that the impact of the Y2K problem
will create
massive unemployment worldwide. Right now billions of dollars are being
diverted to upgrade computers around the world. Those billions of dollars
are going to highly-paid computer programers. Layoffs off other employees
are already beginning.
At this point, it's hard to tell if they are being
laid off due to the Asian monetary crisis or funds
diverted to Y2K
projects.
Gradually, it may be more apparent.
But, economically,
diverting money from many low-paid jobs to pay a few
high-paid jobs is bad
for the economy, because it slows the "velocity of
money." That means
that high-paid people just sit on their money or invest
it in stock market
speculation, etc, whereas low-paid workers need to spend
most of their
money immediately for food, shelter, etc. -- (which
explains why Reagan's
"trickle-down" theory never really helped poor
people). Money circulates
through the economy faster when all the low-paid people
are employed,
creating more prosperity.
In January of 2000 will come the computer crashes and the
fall of
different business that can't afford to fix problems.
That will create
some unemployment.
After January will come the bulk of the high-dollar
lawsuits against
hundreds or thousands of businesses and institutions
around the world who
caused damages because they were not Y2K compliant.
More money to pay out.
More layoffs. More unemployment.
Then maybe a year later another wave of layoffs as the
crippling effects
to international trade are felt because of third world
countries that
could not upgrade ocean ports and air ports sufficienctly
to maintain the
same level of trade.
Effects of urban unrest caused by Y2K breakdowns
make themselves felt to distant trading partners. Less demand for
products. More
unemployment.
I personally think that one of the biggest dangers of the
Y2K virus is
that it will escalate unemployment around the world.
But, here Prabhupada is saying, Yes, we can expect
unemployment will
increase, but it will be a preaching opportunity for us,
because we will
bring people to our farms and give them employment. When we do this,
they will become devotees.
According to Srila Prabhupada's vision, the material
catastrophe is
actually an excellent preaching opportunity -- if we
prepare for it.
your servant,
Hare Krsna dasi
(Text COM:1983039) -----------------------------------------