Seven
Days North Of Tibet
BY DHARMAPADA DASA/DEAN DE LUCIA
EDITORIAL, Feb 27 (VNN) Much energy
has been spent by adherents to the
Hollow Earth Theory in order to localize
the polar entrances, specifically the northern
one, to the hollow portion of the Earth. Their research material has come from many sources- for
example, modern scientific methods of
gathering information have been
employed, from satellite pictures to seismological sound wave surveys. But earlier on, Hollow Earthers
have looked towards legend and folklore,
as well as the results from polar
exploration, as their sources of
information.
The Bhagavat Purana, for example,
contains the story of the sons of
Maharaj Sagara, who were ordered by their
father to search the entire globe for the sacrificial horse which had been stolen by Indra. At one
point, the Bhagavat tells us that the
sons of Sagara went off in the
northeastern direction and entered into the interior of the Earth, where they found the horse at
the hermitage of Kapila Rishi ( they
were not nice about it to the rishi ).
In Hollow Planets, Jan Lamprecht touches on
Tibetan Buddhist beliefs regarding the city of
Shambala, where the Bhagavat Purana says the
Kalki Avatar will appear, and the kingdom of
Agharta, in which the city is situated.
Other Puranas offer a bit more detail- they tell that the Sagaras came upon a northern ocean, which
they crossed over, and that they then
entered into the bowels of the Earth.
In Hollow Planets, Jan Lamprecht touches
on Tibetan Buddhist beliefs regarding
the city of Shambala, where the Bhagavat
Purana says the Kalki Avatar will appear,
and the kingdom of Agharta, in which the city is situated. Specifically, Jan tells of some
conversations held by Nicholas Roerich,
a patron of culture, with various Lamas
and Tibetans as he traveled in that region
with his wife in the 1920s. ( His artwork is still displayed at the Nicholas Roerich Museum at
319 West 107th Street in New York. )
Roerich wrote: " I remembered how
during our crossing of the Karkaroum
Pass, my sais, the Ladaki, asked me.' Do you know why there is such a peculiar upland up here?
Do you know that in the subterranean
caves here many treasures are hidden,
and that in them lives a wonderful tribe
which abhors the sins of the Earth?' And again
when we approached Khotan the hooves of our horses sounded hollow as though we rode above caves
or hollows. Our caravan people called
our attention to this, ... When we saw
entrances of caves, our caravaneers told us
' Long ago people lived there; now they have gone inside; they have found a subterranean
passage to that subterranean
kingdom.'"
Jan Lamprecht recounts the most
important passages of a conversation
which Roerich had with a Tibetan Lama in
1928: Roerich: " Lama, tell me of Shambala.
Lama: " But you Westerners know
nothing about Shambala- you wish to know
nothing. Probably you ask out of
curiosity; and you pronounce this sacred word in vain.
Jan tells that after some cajoling by
Roerich, the Lama studied him and said:
Lama: " Great Shambala is far
beyond the ocean. How and why do you people take interest in it? Only in some places, in the
far North, can you discern the
resplendent rays of Shambala [ aurora?
]. ... The secrets of Shambala are well
guarded." Roerich: " Lama, how does it happen that Shambala on Earth is still undiscovered by
travelers? On maps you may see so many
routes of expeditions. It appears that
all heights are already marked and all
valleys and rivers explored."
Lama: "But as yet ... people have
not found all things - so, let a man try
to reach Shambala without a call! You
have heard about the poisonous streams which encircle the uplands. Perhaps you have even seen
people dying from these gases when they
come near them. ... Many people try to
reach Shambala, uncalled. Some of them
disappear forever. Only a few of them reach the holy place and only if their karma is ready."
More recently, a Tibetan Lama,who is a
renowned teacher of Vajrayana Buddhism
and a Tibetan doctor, lectured in the
San Jose, California area, and made a reference to Shambala. His title is: His Holiness Orgyen
Kusum Lingpa," so it seems that he
belongs to a certain lineage and might
be privy to ancient information on the
matter. While lecturing in San Jose, this Lama stated that Agharta could be reached from India by
flying northwards for seven days. I
would assume the Lama's references were
to the speed at which the bird might
fly. If that is so, then the average bird flying northwards from India for seven days could
easily reach the Artic " ( Related
in Hollow Planets, page 391 ).
At a different place, and a different
time, not at all seven days North of
Tibet, the deck of the ship Fram was
packed with visitors wishing a last farewell. They had to board the launch and leave, and join the
crowds waving good bye from the quays.
It was June 24, 1893, in Pepperviken,
Norway, and the Fram weighed anchor. Doctor
Fridtjof Nansen stood on the deck of the ship as it rounded the point on the creek where his
house stood, and spotted his newlywed
wife through his spyglass. It would be
the last time for a long time, as he would
spend years in the Artic.
The Fram's course took it across the Northern
coast of Russia, across the Kara Sea,
past the Taimyr Peninsula and on over to
the New Siberian Islands.
Nansen and his crew proceded northwards
until about 79* latitude, at which time
the ship was purposely allowed to Freeze
onto the Artic ice packs.
Why did Nansen allow this? It was part
of his plan, no less! His mission was to
explore the Northern Sea, pass over or
near the pole, and make an attempt on the pole
itself should this be possible. He was to accomplish this by verifying the existence of a current
which runs from the Siberian side of the
pole, past the pole itself, then
outwards between Greenland and Iceland, and
then on out into the Atlantic. Actually, it was already known that such a current passed between
Greenland and Iceland, but it wasn't
understood wherefrom it originated. It
was Nansen who theorized that the flow
was all the way from the Siberian side of the polar basin. He felt this way because a ship had
recently sunk near the Siberian Islands,
the Jeanette, and artifacts from that
ship were found about three years later on the
Western coast of Greenland. Thus instead of making a frontal assalt on the pole, working against
nature, Nansen decided to harness the
action of nature itself and drift up to
the poles while his ship was perched on
ice floes.
A special ship was built for the
purpose, with a triple hull, special
supports and extra bulkheads. The slope of
its hull was more horizontal than any other ship so that the squeezing ice would force the ship
upwards by pinching it from the bottom.
They carried five years of supplies,
including coal, coal oil and kerosine. Unlike
any previous Artic explorers, the crew was comfortable all the way through the journey.
So there they were, locked into the ice
by September 25th, 1893. It is
interesting, though, that the polar
anomolies had started before, while on their way up from the New Siberian Islands. Nansen reported on
these anomalies in his notes which
became the basis of his book Farthest
North. We shall include the page notes in
order to better facilitate any verifications which the readers may wish to make : Page 97: Monday,
September 18th, 1893, Bielkoff Island.
Latitude 75.5 degrees North.
Page 98: [ Still same entry as above. ]
" It was a strange feeling to be
sailing away North in the dark night to
unknown lands, over an open, rolling sea, where
no ship, no boat had been before. We might have been hundreds of miles away in more southerly
waters, the air was so mild for September
in this latitude.
Tuesday, September 19th, I have never
had such a spendid sail. On to the
North, steadily North, with a good wind,
as fast as steam and sail can take us, with an open sea mile after mile, watch after watch, through
these unknown regions, always clearer
and clearer of ice, one might say! ...
We see ' nothing but clean water ' as
Henriksen answered from the crow's nest when I called up to him. When he was standing at the wheel
later in the morning, and I was on the
bridge, he suddenly said: ' They think
little at home in Norway just now that we are
sailing straight for the pole in clear water. ''No, they don't believe we have gotten so far.' ... Now
we are almost at 77* North latitude. ...
I have almost to ask myself if this is
not a dream." Page 99: " We
have almost reached 78*
" I seemed to me that there might
be land at no great distance, we saw
such a number of remarkable number of
birds of various kinds. ... They were probably on their passage from some land in the North. ...
Again, later, we saw small flocks of
snipe, indicating the possible proximity
of land. " Although Nansen did not realize it, the anomalies that he was experiencing and
would continue to experience, as well as
the anomalies experienced by other Artic
explorers, would inspire further hollow
Earth reseach and, indeed, become part
and parcel of hollow Earth lore. This is only natural, because one has to search for an explanation
for such strange experiences, i.g., for
the fact that they didn't find ice until
79*, even though ice was to be found at
much lower latitudes all around the polar circle. For example, until they came over as far East as
the New Siberian Islands, they had to
closely hug the coast of Russia in order
to aviod the ice which impinged itself
upon them. So how could it be that they encountered open, rolling seas as they shot northwards
towards the Pole?
Those familiar with the Hollow Earth
Theory would explain that the polar
opening, which they have always had reason
to believe is located near the area where the
Fram was navigating, serves as a conduit for warmer air which can have a dramatic impact within
certain Artic areas. And as for the
observations of bird life coming from
the North? Did the flight of these birds originate from the other side of the pole, from deep
within the Artic wastelands of North
America? Probably not; but the close
proximity of a polar opening, leading to closer
lands, would certainly provide the platform needed to explain the direction and origin of the birds
flight. In fact, according to recent
radar mapping which indicated low and
weak echo responses in the area, the polar
opening could be centered at 141* East longitude and 84.4* North latitude.
Page 101: Here it is related that by September
25th the Fram was " frozen in
faster and faster."
Page 122: " Today, moreover, we
took solemn farewell of the Sun. Half of
its disk showed at Noon for the last
time above the edge of the ice in the South, a flattened body, with a dull red glow, but no
heat."
" So I travel North, to the gloomy
abode That the Sun never shines on-
There is no day "
At this time, their position was just a
little above 78* 15' North, only six
degrees from the suspected center of the
polar opening, and a degree or two less from its diameter. ( They had temporarily back drifted
) The fact that the Sun had disappeared
below the horizon, introducing the long
Artic night, at that time and from that
latutude, indicates that the curvature of the Earth flattens out a bit at the poles, which is
something that science certainly
accepts- such flattening can even be
seen in astronomical photographs of other planets. But what is not understood is that such
flattening is indicative of a curvature
which actually rounds gradually inwards.
Page 123: [ Still from 78* 15' of
latitude North ] " Sunday, October
29th, Peter shot a white fox this
morning close in to the ship. For some time lately, we have been seeing fox tracks in the mornings,
and one Sunday Mogstad saw the fox
itself. It is remarkable that there
should be so many foxes on this drift ice so far from land."
The question that Hollow Earth thinking
raises is this: Were they really so far
from land? A huge and broad land
formation was seen at the threshold of the polar entrance by polar explorers Cook and Peary,
albeit from a long distance and through
atmospheric layers which funnel light (
the source of the oh-so-common Artic
mirages ). Anomalies in terms of wildlife led Nansen to suspect the existence of uncharted land among
the ice all through his journey.
Page 123: On December 2, 1893, a bear
was encountered by " ice station
Fram. Again they were at 79*. It once
again struck them as so unusual to find bears at this latitude, not only far from the New Siberian
Islands, the closest point of land, but
with a " rolling, open ocean "
between their position and that nearest point of land.
On page 126 of Nansen's book,
disappointment is described as the
navigator all of the sudden determines
the ship's position to be various degrees South of where they had calculated. It is not reasonable to
assume an error which had not been
caught until this moment: could it be
that the curvature of the polar opening was
playing havoc with the indications derived from the angle of their sextant readings? Could it be
that the current had carried them a bit
down the side of the funnel-like
opening, then back up towards the rim of the
funnel?
Page 154: [ On the 17th of January, 1894,
his position had been 79* 41'North
Latitude, 135* 29' of longitude East.
Now it is the next day. ] " Thursday, January 18th. The wind that began yesterday had gone
on blowing from ... S.S.E., S.E., and
E.S.E. [ But now he anticipates a change
] Let us hope it is not bringing a
Northerly wind ... It is curious that there is almost always a rise of the thermometer with these
stronger winds, today it rose to 13* F
below zero ( - 25* C ). A south wind of
less velocity generally lowers the
temperature, and a moderate North wind raises it."
Again we run into the temperature
anomaly, along the lines of the "
mild air " reported not far from there,
but back in September. Now the phenomenon is more pronounced- warmer winds from the North in
January of 1894. It is a phenomenon
which has been encountered by all Artic
explorers. Although there could be various
explanations for this, the explanation according to a Hollow Earth understanding practically
arrests one's attention, and it is this:
That since the polar opening was nearby,
probably centered at 84.4* North, while
Nansen was at 79* North, then a North wind would be coming out of the interior, which would
account for a warmer temperature.
And just to get an even better idea of
how unusual the wildlife anomaly was
deemed to be, we'll reproduce this
statement from page 154, also made from 79* North: " But who expects to meet a walrus on close ice in
the middle of a wild sea of a thousand
fathoms depth, and that in the heart of
winter? None of us ever heard of such a
thing before; it is a perfect mystery." And it would be a perfect mystery, unless there were a land
mass nearby; maybe coming up to the tip
of the polar opening, but not extending
out much along the surface.
And now we introduce a totally different
anomaly, one which has great
implications for the Hollow Earth
understanding, and one which makes Nansen and the crew a rather special group of Norwegians. Stand by
as Dr. Fridtjof Nansen recounts their
sighting of the interior sun: Page 160:
Friday, February 16th. Hurrah! A meridian
observation today shows 80* 01' North latitude ... Today another noteworthy thing happened, which was
that about midday, we saw the Sun, or,
to be more correct, an image of the Sun,
for it was only a mirage."
Page 162: " Monday, February 19th.
... Both today and yesterday we have
seen the mirage of the Sun again; today
it was high above the horizon, and almost seemed to assume a round, disk-like form."
Initially, the good doctor became rather
depressed when the sun appeared low on
the horizon, as that would be an indication of yet another supposed error in navigation and
place them quite to the South. But it
was noted that the image was appearing
in the wrong location, on the wrong side of
things, which led the Norwegians to conclude that it was a mirage. We will come back to this
phenomenon as it may be the most
singularly spectacular event, and the event
most pregnant with meaning, to ocurr during the entire trip. But one thing is for sure- Nansen and
his crew were practically broadsided by
a phenomenon so stunning and shocking in
scope that they did not even suspect the
true nature of what they were witnessing. The fact that the inner sun was seen a bit higher from the
16th to the 19th is explained by their
movement, which must have brought them a
tad bit closer to the opening.
Now we have further demonstration that
not all anomalies are confined to wind
and overly adventurous wildlife:
Page 182: [ From 80* 20 N ] " I
take into consideration the striking
warmth of the water deep down ... This warm
water can hardly come from the Artic Sea itself ... It can hardly be anything other than the Gulf
Stream which finds its way hither "
As part of their scientific
investigation, they documented depth soundings, temperature readings from the water at
various depths, temperature readings
from the deck, and even temperature readings
from the crow's nest. So it was not unusual
that they concerned themselves with the temperatures in the deep, it was a part of their rountine.
But insofar as the interpretation of
those temperatures are concerned, what
else is Nansen going to conclude given
his restricted perspective? He was sent by the Norwegian crown to investigate the Northern Sea; why
would he suspect any openings to the
hollow portion of the Earth in the
middle of the Artic ocean? He had probably never imagined such a thing in his wildest dreams.
Towards the end of winter, on May 13,
1894, more wildlife anomalies began,
still in the middle of an Artic
wasteland. They can be best explained by a polar opening nearby: Page 192: " We had not
expectd to meet with much bird life in
these desolate regions. On May 13, 1894,
a gull paid a visit ... After that date, we
regularly saw birds of different kinds in our vicinity until it became a daily occurrence." On
July 18th Doctor Nansen brings our
attention to yet other polar anomalies
quite noticed and well documented by other explorers, at this point the ship was just above 81* North:
Page 201: " Wednesday, July 18th.
Went on an excursion with Blessing in
the forenoon to collect specimens of the
Brown snow and ice. ... The upper surface of the floes is nearly everywhere a dirty, brown
color, or, at least, this sort of ice
preponderates, while pure white floes
... are rare.
....; but the specimens I took today
consist, for the most part, of mineral
dust mingled with diatoms and other
ingredients of organic origin." [ Dr. Nansen mentions in the footnotes that ] "
larger quantities of mud, however, are
also often to be found on the ice ...
but are doubtlessly more directly connected with land." Page 488: " Siberian driftwood, ... as
well as the mud found on the ice
...
even when we were as far North as
86*."
The question always arises in relation
to how one interprets such data. The
sediment types from the mud typically
found on the ice floes seemed to correspond to
Siberian rivers, wherefrom some ice could have broken off. But the sediment types also correspond
to Alaskan sediments- they did not
correspond to European sediments.
Driftwood found near Greenland was definitely
of Siberian and Alaskan origin, not European. Therefore, a Hollow Earther asks, why couldn't such
evidence also correspond to a land mass
at the entrance to the hollow world? The
problem is that we have no sediment samples
from such a place to compare with the mud from the floes, but since the suspected entrance lies
in the same part of the polar basin as
Siberia and Alaska, why wouldn't such a
place provide a more likely explanation
for the mud found on the ice floes? It would be a closer source.
Granted that sediment types from the mud
found on the icebergs do not constitute
such strong evidence. But what about the
pollen dust which covered the majority of
the exposed surface of the ice? There may have been land masses which could have accounted for the
existence of a bit of mud on the ice,
but there was certainly not much in the
way of vegetation which could have produced such a covering of organic dust all over the ice.
Has any observer ever noticed huge
clouds of pollen dust traveling from the
Artic ocean in order to deposit
themselves on the ice up at 82* North? Since the ice has movement, such clouds of pollen would have to
be constant in order to re-generate
their dusty cover on the ice. Would not
a polar opening, through which the winds
of a continent are funneled, better account for
such an observation? Pollen dust was not the only dust encountered by the Fram and its crew.
Clouds of Volcanic dust were found, too,
consisting or iron and carbon particles.
These huge clouds descended on the Fram
and settled everywhere and enveloped
eveything, causing discomfort and irritation. Nansen noted: Let us go home. What have we to stay
for? Nothing but dust, dust, dust."
There were no active volcanoes at this
time, certainly not for thousands of miles. But the Fram wasn't the only ship to encounter such
dust, so any source for the volcanic dust
found in the Artic would have to be
typically active and any route which the dust
might travel would have to display regular traffic in this regard, which is something that we don't
see. A polar opening to the interior of
our planet, with an associated land
mass, provides a plausible explanation.
We shall examine one more Artic anomaly
which has been typically reported by
Artic explorers- that of an erratic
compass.
Page 216: " ... there is a perceptible
deviation of the compass with every degree
of longitude as one passes East or
West." ( Sadek Adam, Hollow Earth Authentic, page 25 and 26 ). "A magnetized needle
free to pivot in a vertical plane would
indicate the angle the magnetic field
makes with the surface of the Earth- This is
called magnetic inclination or dip. At or near the equator the inclination is zero and the dip
needle takes a horizontal position. At
the magnetic poles, the dip needle takes
a vertical position. ... It is not the
nature of magnetic meridians to reach a single converging point at high latitudes. In other
words, a compass needle will point
straight down all along the
circumference of the polar opening giving, as with the false geographic North Pole, a circle of
magnetic North Poles, as the lines of
force traverse the interior of the
Earth. ... And furtghermore, when one travels beyond the lip of the opening ( now going
South/inwards ) past the point of
maximum strength, the compass points
upwards to North. This has confused many explorers. The compass cannot lie, of course. Reed says what
seems to be a defective compass turns
out to be a powerful truth to
substantiate a great truth." This polar anomaly, besides being referred to as the anomaly of
the erratic compass, is also the anomaly
of getting lost! Just see: In March of
1895, Nansen finally decided to set out in
order to conquer the pole over the ice by dog and sled. They would have to make it back to land on
their own as the Fram's position would
not be stationary on the ice- they couldn't
return to the same place and find her.
Although the westward motion of the ship was good, it didn't seem to them at the time that the ship
would go much further North. So he set
out accompanied by Peter Henriksen. They
quickly encountered two unforseen
problems once they were on their own. For one, the layout of the ice change as they went North.
It developed ridges and troughs which
were painstaking and time consuming to
pass over. Their northern most point was
reached on April 9, 1895, at 86* 10' North.
Their second problem was that they ended
up rather lost and stayed that way for a
long time. As an example, by June 14th,
Nansen recorded his position to be 57* 40' of
longitude ( not latitude ). Later on, once he got home, he felt that it had been more like 6* further
East of that. He even realized at the
time, though, that he was lost because,
as he headed South towards Franz Josef on
the Russian side, he wasn't even sure on which side of the archipelago they would come down on! Suffice
it to say that these men were no
amateurs as navagaotrs, but their
problem was still being compounded by the
flattening of the curvature in the vicinity of the opening, which begins to occur as much as 400
miles out from the opening's center.
Although the two had traveled to the
side of the opening now, towards the pole, they
were farther North than ever at 86* N Nansen and Henriksen both made it back alive by way of
the winter hut of Frederick Jackson, a
British explorer, in Franz Josef Land.
The ship Fram finally broke out of the ice
on the Atlantic side of ice on August 13th, 1896, and made its way back to Norway.
But now let us go back to February 16th
and 19th of 1894, to when the mock sun
was sighted. The Fram lay ice-locked at
80* North. Its position in terms of
longitude seems to have zig zaged a bit, but the ship's position was at about 135* East longitude.
Remember that the Fram was very close to
the opening that moment, the center of
the opening being around 141* East and 84.4*
North. So the zig zag that the navigator represented in terms of longitude could have been na error
due to a dip along the curvature as the
ship moved North upon the ice.
Assuming that the Fram was well within
the bounds of the curvature maybe the
crew was not actually looking at a mock
sun. This " sun " was observed just above the horizon. Maybe from the Fram's angle of view
along the side of the funnel-like
opening, the crew was peering through
the hole and into the hollow world, such that
they saw the inner sun close to the rim of the opening. Had they been directly above the opening,
they might have seen the interior sun in
the center of the opening. But their
view of the ninety-some-mile wide opening was
foreshortened due to their sidelong angle from their point along the rim. Nansen and the crew saw
the inner world through the Artic mists
caused by warmer, humid air mixing with
the colder air of the exterior. This
seems to be a typical if not permanent condition, otherwise perception of the inner world might
be an easier matter.
Of course, if all this talk of
longitude, latitude, curvature and
magnetic dips is a bit confusing at first,
the hollow Earth theory can always present the matter in a slightly easier-to-understand manner- Maybe
now the reader has anticipated that the
Fram's position was about seven days
North of Tibet, in a northeastern
direction, in a Northern ocean.
For updates and discussion in relation
to alternative science, including the
Hollow Earth Theory, click on VNN's new
Alternative Sciences Forum.