Higher dimensional science

 

Consciousness and Superintelligence

 

Inverse Evolution

 

Transmigration and Karma

 

  HIGHER DIMENSIONAL SCIENCE

 

  A discussion of realms of experience and strategies of investigation    transcending the limits of mechanistic science. 

 

James D. Watson, codiscoverer of DNA, once said of the mystery of life, "It is  very complex, but it can be explained by the laws of chemistry, by random  thermal motion. It's complicated; there are many variables, but there's no doubt  it's that."(1) 

 

He recalled that this conviction had strongly motivated both himself and Francis  Crick during their pioneering research into the structure of DNA. "We wouldn't  have been doing it if we hadn't believed that chemistry would explain it. Up to  then people felt that chemistry wasn't ever going to be enough, that you needed  religion to explain life. But even when I was in college I was influenced by  Linus Pauling's insistence that you can explain life on the basis of  chemistry."(2) 

 

His attitude toward religion is further illuminated in the following statement:  "When I wrote the first edition of my text [The Molecular Biology of the Gene].  I thought, I am rewriting the Bible--actually going back and finding out what's  up [our italics]."(3) 

 

All in all, Watson's statements represent the general drift of scientific  thought over the past several centuries--faith in explaining complex phenomena  (such as life, the origin of species, the origin and structure of the universe,  etc.) by simple, mathematically expressed natural laws. Some scientists and  religionists have attempted to preserve some last role for God as the guarantor  of the laws of physics, but this gives the laws of physics a status superior to  that of God in the universe. With this compromise the substance of the original  concept of the omnipotent God is completely eliminated, and one is left with a  meaningless empty shell. Religions that have accepted this compromise should  reevaluate their position.  For his part, Watson maintains an unshakable faith that physical explanation is  always possible. "On the level of DNA it [the physical explanation of life] goes  very well. On a more complicated level, we're still trying to figure it out.  Embryology is much harder. And in neurobiology there are very few insights. But  some [scientists] will have a moment when the light will come on . . . The  problem of explaining consciousness in biological terms is a tougher one, but  I'm sure it will fall out."(4) 

 

Here the major shortcoming of modern science is brought into clear focus. Watson  admits that fundamental aspects of living organisms have not been completely  explained by physical laws; yet he insists that they can be and will be so  explained, ruling out in advance any nonmaterial, nonmechanistic explanation.  But is this really true? Could it be that Watson's faith is ill-founded? All  available evidence points clearly to the possibility that the complex forms of  living organisms may never be explained by simple physical laws. One could  perhaps say that Shakespeare's plays can be explained by the 26 letters of the  alphabet, but there is certainly more involved than that. In the same way,  scientists may say that life can be explained by a genetic code embedded in  certain molecules, but as of yet this approach has failed to account for the  complexity of even the simplest life forms. Just as no one has found any simple  set of laws that could allow a computer to transform the 26 letters of the  alphabet into a Hamlet or Macbeth, so no scientist has shown how any set of  simple natural laws could transform a few basic molecular building blocks of  life into a single self-reproducing cell.  So perhaps just as the fundamental laws of physics cannot be reduced any  further, the material complexity we observe in living organisms cannot be  reduced any further. A few freethinking scientists with the courage to challenge  current preconceptions have taken this bold step. Reviewing the conclusions of  his own investigations, prominent biologist Waiter M. Elsasser states that the  complex biochemical forms of living organisms are "of a primary and irreducible  type of natural order, on the same level as the more conventional laws of  nature."(5) 

 

Absolute Complex Form

 

Having failed to reduce complex things to simple principles, the scientist now  has two choices. First, he can simply stop, saying these things exist but we can  say nothing more about them. Second, he can go forward by searching for  principles suitably complex to have generated the irreducible complexity he  observes. In other words, he must consider the existence of an absolute complex  form. He might then inquire about the nature of this form and by what route  information is transmitted from this source to produce the forms and structures  we see in the universe, such as living organisms. We need not have any  preconceptions about the nature of this absolute complex form. From the  standpoint of logic, there are many possibilities that can be considered.  For example, let us consider some alternative possibilities for an absolute  irreducible complex form containing information capable of generating sequences  of complex living organisms. Imagine that in the ocean of the primordial earth  an early amoeba was situated in a certain fixed position and orientation.  Imagine also that in outer space a particular precisely defined pattern of  cosmic rays was hurtling earthward. By the natural course of events our  hypothetical cosmic rays would pass through the earth's atmosphere and zap the  genes of the amoeba in a particular way, thus giving rise to a new and higher  kind of organism (like a trilobite).  In this scenario the particular pattern of cosmic rays and the particular  situation of the amoeba represent a kind of absolute complex form containing  information for the eventual production of a higher organism. Here we have  deliberately chosen an unsatisfying example of what such an absolute complex  form could be like. Once we have traced the origin of the higher form of  organism back to the particular initial configuration of cosmic rays, we can go  no further. We simply encounter a frustrating intellectual dead end. Therefore  let us consider another possibility.    Imagine a more complete information source that originates simultaneously with  the universe--a "cosmic computer" with a read-only memory (ROM) containing data  for all the complex forms that are to be manifested. This proposal may seem  outlandish, but if physicists can ask us to accept the hypothesis that the  entire universe pops out from the quantum vacuum, why can't a universal computer  pop out along with it? Astronomers Sir Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe  have proposed something like this in their book Evolution from Space. "So what  if our progenitor were an extremely complex silicon chip? One thing looks right  about this idea. It would not be possible for an intelligence, however great. to  generate carbonaceous life (life based on carbon compounds] without performing  an immense amount of calculation."(6)  Actually, the idea of a cosmic computer is simply a graphic way of breaking down  the deeply ingrained conception that fundamental principles must be reduced to  simple natural laws. Most scientists are obsessed with the idea of seeing  natural phenomena as a progression from simple to complex, whereas in reality it  appears the opposite is true--anything complex derives from something equally or  more complex. Therefore we could imagine that the cosmic computer, using the  information contained in its memory, might build spaceships that would journey  to different planets, implant life forms in suitable environments, then return  periodically to genetically alter them. In this way, varieties of organisms  could be sequentially produced. 

 

We have proposed that even the structure of a simple cell is of irreducible  complexity. So we could account for this complexity by having suitable programs  in our hypothetical cosmic computer. But in contrast to our cosmic-ray example,  these programs could be more than mere arbitrary repositories of information. If  we envisage organisms as being computerlike automatons, with some, such as  humans, displaying a higher-order behavior we call intelligent, could it not be  that the original cosmic computer might also possess the function of intelligent  behavior and decision making! Here we begin to see how an original absolute  information source might have interesting features that would make us want to  study it in its own right. 

 

Consciousness and Superintelligence

 

Now we come to another feature of reality. We observe in ourselves a variety of  thoughts, feelings, emotions, and perceptions that go beyond the simple ability  of a machine to respond to external stimuli by some sort of data processing. In  other words, our ability to function in an intelligent way is also accompanied  by the phenomenon of consciousness. Consciousness is real--we all have  experience of it. Yet although the behavior associated with consciousness is  quantifiable, consciousness itself remains unexplained by quantitative methods.  It cannot be accounted for by physical laws. So what is it and where does it  come from? 

 

We have been considering a cosmic computer exhibiting a higher order of  intelligence as the original source of certain complex features of the  observable universe. This suggests a beguiling idea--that this cosmic  intelligence could be something more than a lifeless machine. It could possibly  be a conscious superintelligent being from which originates not only the  information that determines the forms of organisms but also the consciousnesses  that animate them. 

 

This conception opens up some interesting possibilities. If there were such an  intelligent being, it would be capable of communicating exact information  through means of its own choosing to those curious about ultimate questions such  as the origin of living beings. And if it were benevolent it might be willing to  do so. 

 

This provides us with another possible strategy for obtaining answers to  ultimate questions. The standard scientific strategy of assuming that ultimate  causes are simple and then seeking such simple causes will certainly fail if the  ultimate cause is irreducibly complex. But if the ultimate cause is a benevolent  superconscious being, then the strategy of assuming that this is so and seeking  a process for coming in contact with such a being may prove successful.  The obvious practical question is this: can we find explicit examples in which  information has been communicated to human beings from an absolute intelligent  source, with the communicated information containing ways and means of showing  that it is bona fide? We propose that the Vedic literatures of ancient India  provide one striking example of an internally verifiable body of knowledge of  this kind. The Vedic literatures contain a general account of epistemology, the  systematic analysis of the procedures for acquiring knowledge, and they also  provide a thorough discussion of the nature and origin of the universe and of  the living organisms that inhabit it. At this point we shall briefly discuss  some important features of the Vedic world view. 

 

  Inverse Evolution

 

The Vedas elaborately describe a complex process of evolution proceeding from  subtle designs to the physical manifestation of these designs in matter.  According to this account, the universal controller directly generates a primary  subordinate controller who generates secondary controllers by an asexual  process. These secondary controllers have the capacity for sexual reproduction.  not only to generate their own kind but also to generate other species. They  contain within their bodies design information for varieties of organisms. This  information, which exists in seedlike subtle forms, originates in the  intelligence of the universal controller, who transmits it to the subordinate  controllers (demigods). Finally the lesser controllers manifest this design  information in the forms of varieties of species, which go on to reproduce  themselves. The Vedas, written thousands of years before Darwin's time, thus  contain the world's oldest account of evolution. However, this Vedic process  reflects the original meaning of the word evolution, which refers to an  unfolding of something existing in an undeveloped form rather than the random  production of something entirely new by physical processes.  The account of the origin of species given in the Vedas is similar to Darwinian  evolution in that it involves physical descent from a common ancestor and the  appearance of new species by sexual reproduction. The Vedic evolutionary concept  differs from the Darwinian in that the common ancestor is a superintelligent  being, not a single-celled creature. Also, the progression of descent is from  more complex forms to simpler ones. It may thus be called "inverse evolution,"  with some of the first steps occurring beyond the earth. 

 

Even some modern scientists have considered the idea of design information being  transmitted from a higher source. Robert Broom, who discovered some of the the  early australopithecus remains in Africa, wrote. "The origin of species and of  much of evolution appears to be due to some organizing and partly intelligent  spiritual agency associated with the animal or plant, which controls its life  processes and tends to keep the being more or less adapted to its environment.  But in addition to this there seem to be other spiritual agencies of a much  higher type which have been responsible for what may be called greater  evolution. . . . These spiritual agencies appear to have worked by directing  from time to time the inferior agencies which are associated with the animals  and plants."(7) Broom's idea, although not exactly parallel to the Vedic  concept, shares with it the notion of higher directing intelligences. 

 

Similar thoughts have been expressed by Alfred Russell Wallace, who along with  Darwin is credited with the formulation of the theory of evolution by natural  selection. He wrote in The World of Life, "If there is such an Infinite Being,  and if . . . his will and purpose is the increase of conscious beings, then we  can hardly be the first result of this purpose. We conclude, therefore, that  there are now in the universe infinite grades of power, infinite grades of  knowledge and wisdom, infinite grades of influence of higher beings upon lower.  Holding this opinion, I have suggested that this vast and wonderful universe,  with its almost infinite variety of forms, motions and reactions of parts upon  part, from suns and systems up to plant-life, animal-life and the human living  soul, has ever required and still requires the continuous coordinated agency of  myriads of such intelligences."(8)    Unlike the majority of scientists, Wallace is prepared to accept that there is  such a thing as purpose in the universe. But his statement about "the human  living soul" shows he is adhering to the standard Western conception that only  human beings have souls. The Vedas, however, teach that all living organisms  have souls and that in addition to the evolution of physical forms, there is a  second evolutionary process involving the transmigration of souls.  The soul is understood to be a unique indestructible unit of consciousness  emanating from the universal conscious entity. These individual units of  consciousness can be seen as identical in substance with the universal  consciousness but much smaller in relative size and power.  The units of consciousness within the bodies of all species are thus  qualitatively identical with each other, yet display a certain range of powers  and abilities based upon the particular characteristics of the physical forms  they inhabit. To understand this principle we can consider how a human driver  can manifest different abilities according to the type of vehicle he is riding  in. On a bicycle, a human can achieve a certain speed, but in a high-powered  sports car, the speed and power increase. In an airplane, the human can fly and  in a boat can cruise over water. In the same way, the conscious selves  inhabiting different bodies manifest different powers and abilities, although  they are all essentially identical.    Transmigration and Karma

 

Transmigration requires procedures to regulate the passage of the conscious self  from one body to another. According to the Vedas, this process is carried out  under higher laws of nature known collectively as the law of karma. The  conscious selves within lower forms such as plants and animals automatically  progress until they reach the human form. The progression from lower to higher  forms corresponds to development from lower to higher states of awareness.  At this point, one might ask why a supreme intelligent being would put a  conscious entity, or soul, through the experience of enduring birth and death in  different kinds of bodies. The answer depends upon appreciating a fundamental  aspect of the conscious self--its freedom to desire as it pleases. The  constitutional position of every self is to knowingly and freely act in harmony  with the desires of the Supreme. If a conscious entity misuses its free will to  act independently of the Supreme, then He accommodates this desire by giving the  entity a field of action in the material universe. There it must endeavor for  survival in an environment of competition and conflict among millions of other  beings motivated by material desires like its own. These interactions among  conscious beings are governed by a principle of universal justice called karma,  under which their successes and failures, and happiness and distress, are  awarded according to their actions in past lives. Every conscious being is thus  personally responsible for its destiny. 

 

The varieties of bodies the conscious beings may enter exist for a dual  purpose--the fulfillment of particular desires to experience material sensation,  and gradual reformation of desire from material to spiritual. To the degree that  a being misuses its freedom and acts in such a way as to harm itself or others,  it must endure correspondingly greater restrictions in its ability to act.  The desire of God is that the soul return to the spiritual level of existence.  But by its own choice the soul may remain in the material world. In life forms  with consciousness less than human, the living entity is fully controlled by  material laws. In the human form consciousness is evolved to the point where one  can see how the material energy is being directed by the universal controller.  This is the key to freedom, because at this level one is able to make conscious  choices affecting his status. The law of karma strongly influences the situation  in which a person finds himself, but it does not strictly determine his  future--there is latitude for free choice. The conscious being can choose to  disregard the will and purpose of the universal controller and continue taking  birth again and again in the material world, perhaps regressing to  less-than-human forms. Or he can desire to act in harmony with this will and  purpose and thus become liberated from the cycle of birth and death and engage  in spiritual sensory activities. 

 

Spiritual sensory activities are possible because sense perception is an  inherent function of the conscious self. A physical sense structure such as the  eye or ear is merely a mechanism for channeling a certain type of sense data to  the perceiving self, known in Vedic writings as the jivatma. The brain is an  information-processing device that is part of this sensory apparatus.  The senses and brain may therefore be considered an interface between the  outside world and the conscious self (jivatma). But this interface is actually a  limitation upon the original sensory capability of the jivatma, because the  material sense structures are designed to register only certain material  phenomena. This limitation is necessary if the soul is to function in  forgetfulness of its spiritual nature and independently of its connection with  God. It is always possible, however, for the soul to awaken its original sensory  capabilities and perceive God directly. The Vedic literatures describe the  histories of the great devotees and sages who have achieved this state of  superconsciousness. 

 

There are various levels of awareness and activity possible within the limits of  the material senses. A person on the ordinary human level of consciousness will  be aware of only the familiar material phenomena known to all of us. But beings  with higher levels of awareness, including those such as devas, or  administrative demigods, have access to deeper and more extensive aspects of  material reality. For example an ordinary person looking at a television program  sees only the forms of people on the screen. But an electrical engineer may  understand exactly how the images are produced and have direct access to the  electronic equipment that generates these images. Just as the engineer working  at a television station operates in a more sophisticated environment than the  person watching the television at home, there may exist in the universe higher  and lower dimensions of material reality corresponding to different levels of  material perception.    If there is a supreme intelligent designer of the universe. He must exist in a  dimension beyond the material time and space that He generates and controls. The  individual soul, being completely spiritual, may also enter this dimension. At  this highest level of consciousness the senses of the jivatma become unimpeded  in their operation, and one can directly perceive the cause of all causes.  Scientists have been engaged for centuries in a philosophical quest for an  ultimate unity underlying the variegated universe. Today this takes the shape of  the physicists' search for a grand unified field theory to explain everything  from subatomic particles to galactic clusters. Such endeavors to find a unifying  material principle have, however, not been successful. 

 

It might therefore be fruitful to consider the unifying aspect of a supreme  conscious entity. To understand this unifying aspect we can draw a parallel  between the supreme conscious entity and the qualitatively similar individual  conscious beings such as ourselves. Even as you are reading this your  consciousness is unifying different aspects of reality--the magazine [or web  page], your self, the environment, your thoughts--into an single integrated  impression. Similarly, the one universal conscious entity, sometimes known as  the Supersoul, is the integrating principle that ties the universe into a  complete whole. All pervasive consciousness is the distinct characteristic of  the Supersoul, in contrast with the infinitesimal living beings, whose  consciousness is extremely limited in scope.  In the Brahma-samhita, a collection of hymns from the Vedic literatures of  ancient India, the author describes how the universal conscious entity ties  together all aspects of reality. "He is an undifferentiated entity. . . . All  the universes exist in Him and He is present in His fullness in every one of the  atoms that are scattered through out the universe. at one and the same time.  Such is the primeval Lord whom I adore." Everything, right down to the atom. is  the energy of the transcendental controlling intelligence, and is thus unified.  Most concepts of unity put forward the idea of a oneness that underlies all  phenomena and is devoid of qualities. But we are suggesting that the ultimate  oneness is full of qualities, personality, and variegated form. Although our own  intelligence can be applied to the forms and patterns of matter and thus lead us  to certain conclusions about the existence of the universal controller, detailed  knowledge about this supreme being and His transcendental actions must be  obtained through another process. According to the Vedic account, the ultimate  source of absolute information is providing information for the design of  organisms. He is also providing information for the functional intelligence of  living beings. enabling them to perform complex activities. In addition, this  original being can provide information about Himself.  The Vedas give an elaborate description of how this absolute information is  disseminated. Essentially this knowledge is communicated via sound vibration.  The information is communicated to the first living being in the universe,  Brahma. And then it is passed down from one spiritual teacher (guru) to another  in a chain of disciplic succession. The Vedic sounds are qualitatively different  from material sounds in that they embody rather than simply represent knowledge. 

 

His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the world's most renowned  Vedic scholar and himself one of the great spiritual masters in the disciplic  chain descending from Brahma, states, "Before the creation the Lord was there,  and therefore the words spoken by the Lord are vibrations of transcendental  sound. There is a gulf of difference between the two qualities of sound, namely  prakrta and aprakyta. The physicist can deal only with the prakrta sound, or  sound vibrated in the material sky, and therefore we must know that the Vedic  sounds recorded in symbolic expressions cannot be understood by anyone within  the universe unless and until one is inspired by the vibration of supernatural  (aprakrta) sound, which descends in the chain of disciplic succession."(9) A  material sound is different from the object it represents. For example, the word  water is different from the substance water, but Vedic sounds are nondifferent  from the spiritual realities they represent. By receiving the Vedic sounds from  the proper channel, the spiritual realities embodied in them are directly  communicated to the receptive listener. The requirement is that one receive the  knowledge as heard and pass it on without change. In this way the information  remains perfect. At a certain point in history the Vedic sound vibrations were  set into writing by the great sage Vyasadeva. These writings form a standard  body of knowledge, and the teachings of spiritual masters can thus be examined  to see if they conform to the Vedic texts such as Bhagavad-gita.  The ultimate goal of knowledge is restoring the conscious self to its original  position free of matter. In the conditioned state, the conscious self attempts  to exercise its faculties apart from the Supreme, but in the liberated state the  self is able to reciprocate on a direct personal level with the supreme person.  Bhakti, or the science of devotional service, is the means for cultivating this  transcendental relationship. 

 

The means for awakening this relationship vary throughout history. In the  present age the Vedas recommend the chanting of mantras composed of the names of  God, particularly the Hare Krsna mantra. The basic principle is that God is  present in the sound of His name. When consciousness is covered by material  conceptions, it cannot properly perceive the self or the Supreme. But the  spiritual energies contained within the transcendental sound vibrations of the  Hare Krishna mantra have the power to remove the material coverings of the self,  thus awakening its original spiritual consciousness and freeing it from the  karmic reactions that entangle it in the cycle of reincarnation.    Scientists have long criticized religion for proposing explanations that one can  believe or not believe but which cannot be reliably tested. But the science of  bhakti-yoga does have practical methods for elevating sensory perception so that  one can actually perceive everything that we are discussing--the soul, the  Supreme Being, and the higher spiritual dimension. 

 

At this point some might claim that such experiences are available only to  special individuals and are therefore not really acceptable as scientific. This  charge can more accurately be leveled at material science. Particle physicists  with access to high-energy particle accelerators may be able to confirm the  existence of certain subatomic particles, but the average person is not equipped  to do so. On the other hand, everyone has the potential to experience the  spiritual knowledge that can be gained through the science of bhakti-yoga. No  special equipment is necessary. 

 

The reason that not everyone is able to immediately obtain direct perception of  nonmaterial phenomena is that there are necessary conditions for the elevation  of consciousness to work. This is also true in science. For instance there was  an experiment performed by the renowned English physicist Henry Cavendish  (1731-1810), for determining the gravitational constant. In this experiment, a  dumbbell is suspended by a thin wire. Iron balls of a certain mass are placed  opposite each end of the dumbbell, and by their influence the dumbbell moves  slightly. When the iron balls are reversed, the dumbbell is moved in the  opposite direction. By calculation one can determine the gravitational constant. 

 

But if there is outside interference from traffic, for example, there is no  possibility of getting an accurate reading. Extraneous influences must therefore  be carefully excluded from the system. In spiritual science also, certain  factors must be excluded in order to get the desired results. There are certain  activities detrimental to higher consciousness. These disturbing influences,  which according to the Vedas keep consciousness on the material platform. are  gambling, meat-eating, illicit sex, and intoxication. A practitioner of  bhakti-yoga therefore carefully avoids them. So-called yoga societies that allow  their members to continue the above-mentioned habits cannot deliver real  spiritual realization.    The ultimate stage of bhakti-yoga is understanding the activities of the supreme  conscious entity in the spiritual dimension. The most confidential sections of  the Vedic literatures describe some of these activities. We have already spoken  of the idea of higher dimensions of existence, and we have indicated they become  accessible by the attainment of higher levels of consciousness. The Vedic  literatures reveal the existence of a spiritual realm that is quite distinct  from this material universe and that in fact constitutes the major portion of  the total reality. The Bhagavad-gita states, "Yet there is another unmanifest  nature, which is eternal and is transcendental to this manifested and  unmanifested matter. It is supreme and is never annihilated. When all this world  is annihilated, that part remains as it is. That which the Vedantists describe  as unmanifest and infallible, that which is known as the supreme destination,  that place from which, having attained it, one never returns--that is My supreme  abode. 

 

God does not create just the material universe. He has His own transcendental  variegated realm in which He engages in pastimes for His own satisfaction. God  is the supreme enjoyer, and innumerable spirit souls on the highest platform of  consciousness live with Him and directly associate with Him. They serve the Lord  constantly without selfish interests. The Lord reciprocates with them by serving  them in turn, and thus both the Lord and His devotees experience varieties of  spiritual pleasure that far surpass any material pleasure. The nature of these  exchanges constitutes a science in itself.  In this magazine we have briefly presented an alternative to the mechanistic  concept of the universe, a science based upon consciousness and personality  rather than atoms and the void. W Heitler, a theoretical physicist at the  University of Zurich, says in his book Man and Science: "Belief in a mechanistic  universe is a modern superstition. As probably happens in most cases of  superstition, the belief is based on a more or less extensive series of correct  facts, facts which are subsequently generalized without warrant, and finally so  distorted that they become grotesque. . . . The 'witch superstition' cost  innumerable innocent women their lives, in the cruelest fashion. The mechanistic  superstition is more dangerous. It leads to a general spiritual and moral  drying-up, which can easily lead to physical destruction. When once we have got  to the stage of seeing in man merely a complex machine, what does it matter if  we destroy him?"(10) 

 

 

 REFERENCES

  1.

  James D. Watson, "James D. Watson (Interview)," Omni, (May 1984), p. 77.

  2.

  James D. Watson, Omni, p. 118.

  3.

  James D. Watson, Omni, p. 77.

  4.

  James D. Watson, Omni, p. 118.

  5.

  Waiter M. Elsasser, "A Form of Logic Suited for Biology," Progress in

  Theoretical Biology, Vol. 6 (1981), p. 57.

  6.

  Sir Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, Evolution from Space (New York:

  Simon and Schuster, 1981), p. 139.

  7.

  Robert Broom, "Evolution--Is There Intelligence Behind It?" South African

  Journal of Science, Vol. 30 (October 1933), pp. 18-19.

  8.

  Alfred Russell Wallace, The World of Life (New York: Moffat, Yard, & Co.,

  1911), p. 431.

  9.

  His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Srimad-Bhagavatam,

  Canto Two, Volume One (Los Angeles: Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1977), p. 228.

  10.

  W. Heitler, Man and Science (New York: Basic Books, 1963), p. 97.

Copyright (c) 1984 by Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, International

 

 

Back to Origins | Back to Books | Back to Main Page

 

Govardhan Hill Publishing

P.O. Box 1920

Alachua, FL 32616-1920

(904) 462-0466 / fax (904) 462-0463 / e-mail: ghi@nersp.nerdc.ufl.edu

Last updated on February 1, 1996.

© 1999 Govardhan Hill Publishing